<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Discussion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://webmazers.com/2009/03/discussion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://webmazers.com/2009/03/discussion/</link>
	<description>Your partner in online treasure hunts!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2010 11:20:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: SinYL</title>
		<link>http://webmazers.com/2009/03/discussion/comment-page-1/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>SinYL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 04:02:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webmazers.com/?p=202#comment-26</guid>
		<description>Hi,
I think there was an error in my explanation.
When = as (not is) to get SALAD.

As for the replacement/anagram indicator, perhaps this could be open for discussion. I know now in this case the setter had intended &quot;takes over&quot; to have the direct interpretation as a replacement indicator, but for hunts in general, isn&#039;t it a norm for an anagram indicator to consist of any word that indicates &quot;change&quot;? So is it possible that in another hunt, in another question, in another phrasing, &quot;takes over&quot; could be used as an anagram indicator?

Anyway, admittedly i had no explanation for the left out &quot;ideally&quot; and as Jaymen has pointed out, this just isn&#039;t &quot;tight&quot; enough to be accepted for a hunt of his standards. :-)

Best Regards,
SinYL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
I think there was an error in my explanation.<br />
When = as (not is) to get SALAD.</p>
<p>As for the replacement/anagram indicator, perhaps this could be open for discussion. I know now in this case the setter had intended &#8220;takes over&#8221; to have the direct interpretation as a replacement indicator, but for hunts in general, isn&#8217;t it a norm for an anagram indicator to consist of any word that indicates &#8220;change&#8221;? So is it possible that in another hunt, in another question, in another phrasing, &#8220;takes over&#8221; could be used as an anagram indicator?</p>
<p>Anyway, admittedly i had no explanation for the left out &#8220;ideally&#8221; and as Jaymen has pointed out, this just isn&#8217;t &#8220;tight&#8221; enough to be accepted for a hunt of his standards. <img src='http://webmazers.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Best Regards,<br />
SinYL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced)

Served from: webmazers.com @ 2012-05-19 18:52:46 -->
