<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hunt #3 &#8211; Answers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://webmazers.com/2009/06/hunt-3-answers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://webmazers.com/2009/06/hunt-3-answers/</link>
	<description>Your partner in online treasure hunts!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2010 11:20:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jaymen</title>
		<link>http://webmazers.com/2009/06/hunt-3-answers/comment-page-1/#comment-48</link>
		<dc:creator>jaymen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 02:37:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webmazers.com/?p=237#comment-48</guid>
		<description>Hello Yeoh and Jo.
Quite a few answered C28 with &quot;perfect shield&quot;.
So i looked at it for quite some time to see whether it is an acceptable alternative.

Yeoh&#039;s explanation differs from others who also chose &quot;perfect shield&quot;.
His explanation incorporates &quot;bearing&quot; while the others ignore the word totally.

So, shield is something that bears a coat of arms.However, that is not universal.Even taken as a valid approach, &quot;coat of arms&quot; is not the same thing as &quot;arms of a kind&quot;.

My main reason for not accepting &quot;perfect shield&quot; as an alternative is that &quot;bearing&quot; has been ignored.
Hope that satisfies your argument, Yeoh.

Regards, Jaymen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Yeoh and Jo.<br />
Quite a few answered C28 with &#8220;perfect shield&#8221;.<br />
So i looked at it for quite some time to see whether it is an acceptable alternative.</p>
<p>Yeoh&#8217;s explanation differs from others who also chose &#8220;perfect shield&#8221;.<br />
His explanation incorporates &#8220;bearing&#8221; while the others ignore the word totally.</p>
<p>So, shield is something that bears a coat of arms.However, that is not universal.Even taken as a valid approach, &#8220;coat of arms&#8221; is not the same thing as &#8220;arms of a kind&#8221;.</p>
<p>My main reason for not accepting &#8220;perfect shield&#8221; as an alternative is that &#8220;bearing&#8221; has been ignored.<br />
Hope that satisfies your argument, Yeoh.</p>
<p>Regards, Jaymen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yeoh</title>
		<link>http://webmazers.com/2009/06/hunt-3-answers/comment-page-1/#comment-47</link>
		<dc:creator>Yeoh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 14:46:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webmazers.com/?p=237#comment-47</guid>
		<description>Well, questions need not always need to have a cryptic clueword as it could be a direct GK question. In this case though, i felt that the second part of the question - bearing arms of a kind - does look like a crytic phrase. Anyway, thanks for sharing your thoughts, Jo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, questions need not always need to have a cryptic clueword as it could be a direct GK question. In this case though, i felt that the second part of the question &#8211; bearing arms of a kind &#8211; does look like a crytic phrase. Anyway, thanks for sharing your thoughts, Jo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jo</title>
		<link>http://webmazers.com/2009/06/hunt-3-answers/comment-page-1/#comment-46</link>
		<dc:creator>Jo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 12:02:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webmazers.com/?p=237#comment-46</guid>
		<description>Totally agree with you, Yeoh... but I guess in cryptic sense, what would be the keyword? In this case, it&#039;ll be wrong and that&#039;s how it fits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Totally agree with you, Yeoh&#8230; but I guess in cryptic sense, what would be the keyword? In this case, it&#8217;ll be wrong and that&#8217;s how it fits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yeoh</title>
		<link>http://webmazers.com/2009/06/hunt-3-answers/comment-page-1/#comment-45</link>
		<dc:creator>Yeoh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 08:36:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webmazers.com/?p=237#comment-45</guid>
		<description>How about Perfect Shield as an answer for C28? 
C28 Nothing wrong bearing arms of a kind!

Nothing Wrong = Perfect
Shield (as those held by knights) bears a coat of arms - &#039;arms of a kind&#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about Perfect Shield as an answer for C28?<br />
C28 Nothing wrong bearing arms of a kind!</p>
<p>Nothing Wrong = Perfect<br />
Shield (as those held by knights) bears a coat of arms &#8211; &#8216;arms of a kind&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced)

Served from: webmazers.com @ 2012-02-04 03:44:05 -->
